Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login
scared woman
Let's play a game of Blame the Victim. I'll start: a woman goes out, has a few drinks, is feeling drunk, and suddenly a man comes along and rapes her. Who gets the blame? If you said the rapist you would be wrong.

More Rapes Linked To Young Women On Drinking Binges


That's the headline given to an article about the number of rapes in San Diego going up. It's not that more men are committing rape, or that rapists are getting away with repeat assaults, or even the more positive outlook that more rapes are being reported. Nope, it's those silly girls getting drunk and getting themselves raped.

From the story:

"The majority are young women who start out in bars or at a house party and end up drinking too much," Kendrick told the newspaper. "They can't consciously make a good decision, like say no and leave. Or maybe they've had too much to drink and can't leave."

Right, because having the audacity of being a woman, drinking, and in a place where there are rapists is really just a matter of making the wrong decision. Everyone knows that if you just tell your rapist no he'll let you get up and leave, it's just that the women are too drunk to do that.

beer
How about that more men are targeting women drinking in bars or parties. Which really isn't that surprising given the way rape cases are handled today. If a woman drinks too much she not only has to worry about being raped, but also that the judge will decide if she was too drunk to walk she was also too drunk to say no. Rather than ruling more harshly against the rapists who take advantage of woman who are intoxicated the women are punished for doing the drinking, sending the not-so-subtle message that "good girls" stay at home and wash their hair rather than leave the house and behave like everyone else is. And of course if you're not a good girl then it's not really rape/it's totally your fault.


One good thing is that from this San Diego's rape numbers should decrease. Not that the number of actual rapes will go down, just that more women will choose not to report them for fear of how they will be treated when it's discovered that their ankles were showing.

Image source - Brenna Lorenz, Martin Walls
115
Vote
Shared on
   


News From Around The Web

July 22nd 2008 14:54
screaming
Why is it that reading the news sometimes makes me feel a little stabbity? I don't know what it is, but often I just have to put down the paper or turn off the computer and walk away. Luckily I know several deep breathing exercises. Today is one of those days when scrolling through my news updates I can feel my blood pressure going up. So rather than risk a heart attack trying to explain the painfully bad in the news, I'm just going to share a quick run down of the articles that are not helping to ease the headache in the back of my head. Warning, be sure to take a couple aspirin before attempting to read this.

Female soldiers raise alarm on sexual assaults - "It took Diane Pickel Plappert six months to tell a counselor that she had been raped while on duty in Iraq. While time passed, the former Navy nurse disconnected from her children and her life slowly unraveled.

Carolyn Schapper says she was harassed in Iraq by a fellow Army National Guard soldier to the extent that she began changing clothes in the shower for fear he'd barge into her room unannounced — as he already had on several occasions."

Need for Survival Fuels Sex Work, High Birth Rate Kills Mothers in Afghanistan - "Women and young girls are being pushed to commercial sex work due to high food prices and widespread unemployment in Afghanistan. High fertility rates, poor health services, and a high maternal mortality rate compound these issues."

Online Adoption Agency Denies Service to Gays - McCain should be smiling over this one " [...] as the couple researched Websites that help birth mothers find loving permanent homes for their babies, they were disturbed to learn that the popular ParentProfiles.com only allows "one male husband and one female wife" couples to use its Internet-based adoption-matching service."

New Legislation Threatens American-Indian Women's Reproductive Health
- "Opponents say Vitter has tethered crucial health programs to an anti-abortion agenda and brazenly targeted Native women's reproductive rights.

't's a race-based amendment, because it's trying to reduce our right to access abortion more than any other race of women in this country,' says Charon Asetoyer of the Native American Women's Health Education Resource Center (NAWHERC), a research and advocacy organization."

I'm going to try and end on a good note by pointing to this incredible article by Senator Clinton calling out the anti-choice, anti-science crowd for showing their true colors on abortion, birth control, and sex. Rock on Hilary, rock on.

The Bush Administration is up to its old tricks again, quietly putting ideology before science and women's health. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is poised to put in place new barriers to accessing common forms of contraception like birth control pills, emergency contraception and IUDs by labeling them "abortion." These proposed regulations set to be released next week will allow healthcare providers to refuse to provide contraception to women who need it. We can't let them get away with this underhanded move to undermine women's health and that's why I am sounding the alarm.
54
Vote
Shared on
   


What I Miss This Week?

July 17th 2008 19:44
browsing
I can't believe it's Thursday already and I haven't posted. It's certainly not been for a lack of things to write about. Sometimes I just need to take a few days away from the news feeds to preserve my sanity. Or at least reduce the wear and tear on my throat from screaming at the top of my lungs at the news. But I'm back now, loaded up with chocolate and a new bottle of wine. So what's on the radar this week?

The Department of Health and Human Services has decided that medical standards is for the birds, what we really need is to listen to the crackpots on the religious right. The new proposal would be to ignore what the American Medical Association and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists all say about pregnancy and declare that it really begins whenever the fundies say it does. I'd like to remind all the people who claim that "pr-life" really isn't anti-choice that declaring birth control the same as abortion kind of leans towards that "screw your choice" side of things. At least they're ballsy enough to finally stop hiding behind false claims of being for "the babies" and just admitting they want women barefoot and knocked up.

On a similar note Bush isn't going out without taking your choices with him. He is proposing that hospitals, clinics, etc... who receive any federal aid can't refuse to hire people who don't want to do their job. Unfortunately that only applies for birth control and abortions. Darn, I was hoping to get a job filing paper and then claim it's against my religion to touch paper. That's be a sweet gig, getting paid to sit back and claim everyone is oppressing me for my religious beliefs.

The Senate reauthorized PEPFAR and at the same time repealed the ban on HIV-positive travel and immigration. Now we just have to wait and see what the House will do. Keep your fingers crossed.
52
Vote
   


Montana Says No Way To CI-100

June 26th 2008 13:42
I'm tickled pink to have read this little tidbit in the news today.

Opponents of a proposed constitutional amendment to ban abortion by defining a fertilized human egg as a “person” announced Tuesday the measure has failed to gain enough support to qualify for the November ballot.

[ Click here to read more ]
85
Vote
Shared on
   


Feminists Love Men

June 24th 2008 08:05
lipstick
Last night I read about a city in Malaysia that was banning lipstick and loud high heel shoes for Muslim women. The reasoning was that this would some how prevent sexual assault. Aside from being a ridiculous case of blaming the victim this story is a good example of why feminism is actually good for men.

If we are to believe that banning lipstick and the clack of high heels will prevent sexual assault then we must assume that these things encourage sexual assault. Of course we also have to ignore the fact that sexual assault and rape is not about sex but instead about using power and force over another person. Now if we believe that something as simple as lipstick or heels is all that it takes to excites men to the point of committing sexual assault what are saying about men in general? Do we really believe that they are such savage animals that the slightest thing will drive them to commit assault


[ Click here to read more ]
53
Vote
   


Going To The Chapel

June 17th 2008 17:06
same sex marraige
Yesterday at 5:01 PM PST California opened their doors to same sex marriage. One small step for LGBT, one giant leap for equal rights.

Or so it seemed


[ Click here to read more ]
75
Vote
   


Summer Minor's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by Summer Minor
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]