McCain and Palin
August 29th 2008 21:03
As most people already know McCain picked an unknown from Alaska to be his VP choice, Governor Sarah Palin. It's pretty clear that this is quite the calculated choice. It is the first time that the Republicans have put a woman on the ticket, and a nice tie in to McCains ad attacking Obama for not picking Clinton. His message is pretty clear. "See, I love women! I picked one for my VP. Just ignore my policies, ideals, and practices. One vagina is as good as another, isn't it?"
Yes John, we're all clearly such silly women that we'll vote for the vagina without looking at the politics. And if you really think that you're a bigger sexist jerk than I previous thought.
Politically I do not support Palin. She's anti-choice, pro-drilling, supports teaching creationism in public schools and opposes same-sex marriage. Those are just not politics I can get behind. And yet, her very presence is still worth celebrating. Palin herself identifies as a feminist and her place on the ticket as a mother of a young child is important. Normally she would be drug through the mud for choosing not to stay home with her children full time. As one blogger Hugo says:
I'm curious how this plays out with the deeply religious who feel a woman's place is in the home as well as with those who instinctively bare their teeth at the mention of the word "feminist". We will have to see how McCain's choice goes for him. Will he be able to win enough voters who want a woman no matter what to counter the loss of voters who want nothing to do with a woman/mother/feminist in the office?
Lastly I want to direct everyone over to Shakesville where the point is made clearly. You can attack her politics, attack her issues, attack her opinions. But her gender is not on the table. Sexism is still sexism, even if you don't like the woman it's being aimed at.
Yes John, we're all clearly such silly women that we'll vote for the vagina without looking at the politics. And if you really think that you're a bigger sexist jerk than I previous thought.
Politically I do not support Palin. She's anti-choice, pro-drilling, supports teaching creationism in public schools and opposes same-sex marriage. Those are just not politics I can get behind. And yet, her very presence is still worth celebrating. Palin herself identifies as a feminist and her place on the ticket as a mother of a young child is important. Normally she would be drug through the mud for choosing not to stay home with her children full time. As one blogger Hugo says:
From a feminist standpoint, I’m thrilled that a candidate who is the mother of a very young child has been nominated. One of the standard tropes of social conservatism is that mothers of young children should not work outside the home. If Sarah Palin is the vice-president, one heartbeat (a septuagenarian heartbeat at that) from the presidency and also the mother of a special-needs toddler, that sends a powerful message about the compatibility of motherhood with career. However right-wing Palin’s politics are, the narrative of her life today reflects a deep feminism. She embodies, literally, the notion that women ought not be forced to choose between family and public duty. That’s a deeply progressive message, even if it’s sent by an ostensibly conservative woman.
Lastly I want to direct everyone over to Shakesville where the point is made clearly. You can attack her politics, attack her issues, attack her opinions. But her gender is not on the table. Sexism is still sexism, even if you don't like the woman it's being aimed at.
| 85 |
| Vote |
Shared on











Comments (12)
Add Comments


Read More








